![]() |
|||||
| . |
Teaching Outreach Conference For the Instructors of Economic Theory CoursesGeneral Description: Participants: Agenda and Content: For the second session the audience was split into two groups for active demonstrations of classroom experiments. One group participated in microeconomic experiments: “A Principal-Agent Game” (which focuses on labor contracts design) and “An Auction Market Game” (which demonstrates how free markets work). The second group participated in macroeconomic experiments: “A Credit Market Experiment” (which demonstrates the difference of the effects of real and nominal interest rates on aggregate investments), and “A Savings/Consumption Game” (which shows the impact of savings and consumption on aggregate output, unemployment and price level). The third session of the conference included presentations by the US Embassy and IREX representatives about funding opportunities available from their institutions for instructors of economics. Then, Tom Coupe (EROC/EROC) talked about practical grant application hints and general techniques to produce successful grant proposals. Afterwards, a number of participants acknowledged that the information received during this session was truly useful. The fourth session was devoted to course and teaching evaluations. Artem Panchenko (EERC Academic Affairs specialist) shared the experience of the EERC MA program in Economics in doing course and teaching evaluations. Volodymyr Vakhitov (EERC/University of Kentucky) talked about his experience with mid-semester evaluations done at the University of Kentucky. Victoriya Sereda (Ivan Franko Lviv National University) presented the results and challenges of course and teaching evaluation experiment carried out at Ivan Franko Lviv National University. For many conference participants the idea of formal teaching evaluations was rather novel, and raised active and sometimes controversial discussions. The second day of the conference started with the presentation of problem-based learning approach, which is a relatively new teaching methodology that is getting recognition in different fields. Even though only a general introduction to the method was done during this session, the presentation provoked a vivid debate among the participants concerning its applicability to teaching economics. The final two sessions of the conference were less formal in nature and included discussions of academic research practices in the US, Canadian and Western European universities, and comparisons to Ukrainian and other regional practices. Also, a number of issues related to the Bologna process in higher education, and the implications of the process for the economics curricula were discussed. These sessions offered the conference participants to actively debate on the most problematic aspects of the academic research practices and economics curricula in Ukraine and other regions compared to the world practices. The insights of the presenters who have working experience at the US (Sergiy Ilchuk, RAND), Canadian (Yuriy Yevdokimov, University of new Brunswick) and German (Timofey Mylovanov, University of Bonn) universities were found to be particularly helpful by the participants. Some conference's presentations:
Download Draft Conference Agenda English (Ukrainian) Conference photo gallery
|
||||
|
|
|
Tel.: (38-044) 492-8012 Fax: (38-044) 492-8011 E-mail: kse@eerc.kiev.ua Internet: http://www.kse.org.ua |
2006© Kyiv School of Economics Web team |